4.5 Article

Multiple quantitative trait loci modify the heart failure phenotype in murine cardiomyopathy

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 12, 期 23, 页码 3097-3107

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddg333

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL69230] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL069230] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The variability in outcome of heart failure patients depends on a number of factors including differences in their genetic background. To identify novel genes that modify the human heart failure phenotype, we used a strategy of quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping in an experimental mouse model of dilated cardiomyopathy induced by cardiac-specific overexpression of calsequestrin and characterized by a strong strain-specific variability in the phenotype. We identified two novel QTLs, Hrtfm3 (heart failure modifier 3) on chromosome (Chr) 4 and Hrtfm4 on Chr 18, significantly linked to survival with likelihood ratio statistics (LRS) of 19.9 and 23.6 respectively (corresponding to LOD scores of 4.3 and 5.1). Two other QTLs, Hrtfm5 on Chr 2 and Hrtfm6 on Chr 13, were significantly linked to cardiac function as measured by echocardiographic fractional shortening (LRS 22.1 and 15.2 respectively, LOD score 4.8 and 3.3) and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LRS 23.5 and 18.8, LOD score 5.1 and 4.1). Importantly, Hrtfm5 was not significantly linked to survival. A significant interaction was found between Hrtfm4 and two other QTLs (Hrtfm6 and a QTL near to the marker D19Mit88) for fractional shortening with a LRS of 34.6 and 26.5 respectively (LOD score 7.5 and 5.8). These data show that the effect of genetic background on murine heart failure is complex and result from the action of several loci that differentially modify the cardiac phenotype. The identification of these novel modifier genes will serve as strong candidates for the discovery of modifiers in human heart failure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据