4.6 Article

Ultrasound examination at 37 weeks' gestation in the prediction of pregnancy outcome: the value of cervical assessment

期刊

ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 598-603

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/uog.913

关键词

37-week scan; cervical length; induction of labor; post-term; ultrasound screening

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To examine the potential value of routine measurement of cervical length in singleton low-risk pregnancies at 37 weeks of gestation in the prediction of onset and outcome of labor. Methods Cervical length was measured by transvaginal sonography at 37 weeks in 1571 singleton low-risk pregnancies. Outcome measures were gestation at spontaneous onset of labor, post-term delivery, duration of labor and mode of delivery. Results The median cervical length at 37 weeks was 30 mm and there was a significant association between cervical length and gestation at delivery, which increased from a mean of 3 8 weeks for cervical length of 10 mm to 41 weeks for cervical length of 35 mm. The incidence of delivery after 40 weeks and 10 days was 296 (18.8%) and the incidence increased with cervical length at 37 weeks from 0% to 6%, 35% and 68% for respective cervical lengths of < 20, 21-30, 31-40 and 41-50 mm. In the pregnancies with spontaneous onset of labor the incidence of Cesarean section for failure to progress increased from 3.6% to 6.0%, 6.4% and 11.8% for cervical lengths of < 20, 21-30, 31-40 and 41-50 mm, respectively. In the pregnancies requiring induction for post-term the incidence of Cesarean section for failed induction or failure to progress increased from 7.5% to 20.1% to 25.0% for cervical lengths of 21-30, 31-40 and 41 50 mm, respectively. Conclusion Measurement of cervical length at 3 7 weeks can define the likelihood of spontaneous delivery before 40 weeks and 10 days and the risk of Cesarean section in those requiring induction for prolonged pregnancy. Copyright (C) 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据