4.4 Article

Novel conditionally immortalized human proximal tubule cell line expressing functional influx and efflux transporters

期刊

CELL AND TISSUE RESEARCH
卷 339, 期 2, 页码 449-457

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00441-009-0882-y

关键词

Proximal tubule cell; Albumin endocytosis; Phosphate transport; Organic cation transport; P-glycoprotein; Human

资金

  1. Cystinosis Research Foundation
  2. Cystinosis Research Network
  3. European Community [FP7/20072013]
  4. Medical Research Council [G0800200] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. MRC [G0800200] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reabsorption of filtered solutes from the glomerular filtrate and excretion of waste products and xenobiotics are the main functions of the renal proximal tubular (PT) epithelium. A human PT cell line expressing a range of functional transporters would help to augment current knowledge in renal physiology and pharmacology. We have established and characterized a conditionally immortalized PT epithelial cell line (ciPTEC) obtained by transfecting and subcloning cells exfoliated in the urine of a healthy volunteer. The PT origin of this line has been confirmed morphologically and by the expression of aminopeptidase N, zona occludens 1, aquaporin 1, dipeptidyl peptidase IV and multidrug resistance protein 4 together with alkaline phosphatase activity. ciPTEC assembles in a tight monolayer with limited diffusion of inulin-fluorescein-isothiocyanate. Concentration and time-dependent reabsorption of albumin via endocytosis has been demonstrated, together with sodium-dependent phosphate uptake. The expression and activity of apical efflux transporter p-glycoprotein and of baso-lateral influx transporter organic cation transporter 2 have been shown in ciPTEC. This established human ciPTEC expressing multiple endogenous organic ion transporters mimicking renal reabsorption and excretion represents a powerful tool for future in vitro transport studies in pharmacology and physiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据