4.3 Article

Evaluation of superficial basal cell carcinomas after treatment with imiquimod 5% cream or vehicle for apoptosis and lymphocyte phenotyping

期刊

DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY
卷 29, 期 12, 页码 1181-1186

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2003.29399.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To characterize the immune response and the apoptotic pathways that result in regression of imiquimod-treated basal cell carcinomas (BCCs). Methods. The trial was conducted as an open-label, matched controlled, nonrandomized study. Twelve patients were assigned as either active-treatment patients or matched control subjects. After treatment, lesions were excised and stained for CD20, CD3, CD4, CD56, bcl-2, bax, caspase-3, and p53. Additionally, a DNA fragmentation assay was performed using the terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP nick-end-labeling method. Results. All vehicle-treated BCCs (six of six) had residual tumor compared with four of six imiquimod-treated BCCs. A dense mononuclear infiltrate surrounded all of the imiquimod-treated tumors and only one of six vehicle-treated BCCs. Staining for CD20, CD3, and CD4 reveled that the infiltrate consisted primarily of T-helper lymphocytes; however, a significant portion of the cells stained positively for CD56, indicating the presence of natural killer cells. Imiquimod-treated BCCs stained more strongly for caspase-3 and to a lesser degree p53 as compared with vehicle-treated BCCs. No differences were seen in either bax or bcl-2 staining. Minimal apoptosis was seen with the terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP nick-end-labeling assay in either group. Conclusion. This study provides evidence that imiquimod's antitumorgenic effects are mediated via up regulation of local interferon-alpha levels and supports previous work, suggesting that increased natural killer cell activity may be an important factors explaining both spontaneous regression and IFN-alpha induced regression of BCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据