4.6 Article

Optimization of enrichment and plating procedures for the recovery of Escherichia coli O111 and O26 from minced beef

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 95, 期 5, 页码 949-957

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02065.x

关键词

E. coli O111; E. coli O26; enrichment media; minced beef; selective agar

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: Optimization of enrichment media and selective agars for the detection of Escherichia coli O26 and O111 from minced beef. Methods and Results: This study compared a number of different enrichment conditions and plating media for the recovery of E. coli O26 and E. coli O111 from minced beef. The optimum enrichment conditions for E. coli O26 was observed in beef samples enriched at 41.5degreesC in tryptone soya broth supplemented with cefixime (50 mug l(-1)), vancomycin (40 mg l(-1)) and potassium tellurite (2.5 mg l(-1)). Similar enrichment conditions were optimal for E. coli O111 with the omission of potassium tellurite. The optimum agar for recovery of E. coli O26 and giving the most effective suppression of contaminants was MacConkey agar [lactose replaced by rhamnose (20 g l(-1))] and supplemented with cefixime (50 mug ml(-1)) and potassium tellurite (2.5 mg l(-1)). Optimum recovery of E. coli O111 was on chromocult agar, supplemented with cefixime (50 mug ml(-1)), cefsulodin (5 mg l(-1)) and vancomycin (8 mg l(-1)). Minced beef samples were inoculated with a number of strains of E. coli O26 (n = 9) and O111 (n = 8), and the developed enrichment and plating methods, used in combination with immunomagnetic separation, were shown to be an effective method for the recovery of all strains. Conclusions: Routine cultural methods for the recovery of E. coli O26 and O111 from minced beef are described. Significance and Impact of the Study: The optimized enrichment and plating procedure described for the recovery of E. coli O111 and O26 from meat can be used to extend research on these emerging pathogens in beef.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据