4.7 Article

Type 3 innate lymphoid cells maintain intestinal epithelial stem cells after tissue damage

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 212, 期 11, 页码 1783-1791

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20150318

关键词

-

资金

  1. ZonMW Innovative Research Incentives Vidi grant [91710377]
  2. People Program (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union's Seventh Framework Program FP7 under REA [289720]
  3. MRC [MR/K021125/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1094322] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Medical Research Council [MR/K021125/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Disruption of the intestinal epithelial barrier allows bacterial translocation and predisposes to destructive inflammation. To ensure proper barrier composition, crypt-residing stem cells continuously proliferate and replenish all intestinal epithelial cells within days. As a consequence of this high mitotic activity, mucosal surfaces are frequently targeted by anticancer therapies, leading to dose-limiting side effects. The cellular mechanisms that control tissue protection and mucosal healing in response to intestinal damage remain poorly understood. Type 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3s) are regulators of homeostasis and tissue responses to infection at mucosal surfaces. We now demonstrate that ILC3s are required for epithelial activation and proliferation in response to small intestinal tissue damage induced by the chemotherapeutic agent methotrexate. Multiple subsets of ILC3s are activated after intestinal tissue damage, and in the absence of ILC3s, epithelial activation is lost, correlating with increased pathology and severe damage to the intestinal crypts. Using ILC3-deficient Lgr5 reporter mice, we show that maintenance of intestinal stem cells after damage is severely impaired in the absence of ILC3s or the ILC3 signature cytokine IL-22. These data unveil a novel function of ILC3s in limiting tissue damage by preserving tissue-specific stem cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据