4.7 Article

Expression and prognostic significance of LIVIN, SURVIVIN and other apoptosis-related genes in the progression of superficial bladder cancer

期刊

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 85-90

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdg002

关键词

BCL-2/BAX; BCL-X; bladder cancer; LIVIN; relapse; SURVIVIN

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: It has been suggested that progression of superficial bladder cancer may be regulated at the molecular level by a typical pattern of expression of genes involved in apoptosis. Recently LIVIN, belonging to the inhibitors of apoptosis (IAP) family, has been found to be expressed in most solid tumors, where its expression is suggested to have prognostic significance. No data are available concerning the significance of LIVIN in the progression of bladder tumors. Patients and methods: In the present paper we used RT-PCR to investigate the expression of LIVIN isoforms alpha and beta, SURVIVIN, BCL-X and BCL-2/BAX expression ratio both in normal and tumoral bladder tissues, and correlated their expression with the emergence of early relapses in a follow-up of 4 years. This study shows that only the alpha isoform of LIVIN, which is not expressed in normal bladder tissue, is expressed in a proportion of tumors with a high risk of relapse. Results: LIVIN was found in 7/30 patients (23%), SURVIVIN in 9/30 (30%), BCL-2/BAX ratio >1 in 16/30 (53%), BCL-2/BAX expression ratio <1 in 14/30 (46.6%) and BCL-X, only in isoform BCL-X-L, in 11/30 (36.6%). When we evaluated the dependence between each gene expression and relapse free time of patients, we found that LIVIN, high BCL-2/BAX ratio and BCL-X-L, but not SURVIVIN, reached statistical significance in order to predict relapses. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that LIVIN may be involved in the progression of superficial bladder cancer and used as a marker of early recurrence; while the expression of SURVIVIN cannot be used to identify patients with high risk of relapse.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据