4.4 Article

Influence of predator identity on the strength of predator avoidance responses in lobsters

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2015.01.002

关键词

American lobster; Atlantic cod; Predation risk; Predator avoidance behavior; Sea raven; Striped bass

资金

  1. University of New England
  2. National Science Foundation [OCE-0709527, OCE-1338372, OCE-0961157, OCE-1333755]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The American lobster, Homarus americanus, is an important benthic consumer in the Gulf of Maine and supports an extremely valuable fishery in New England and eastern Canada. Meanwhile, there is substantial interest in restoring large predator fish species to the Gulf of Maine, and these predators may impact lobster populations both by consuming them and by inducing them to alter their behavior. Lobster tethering experiments were used to examine the susceptibility of a range of lobster size classes to predation in Saco Bay, Maine. The most susceptible sizes of lobsters were then exposed to three different fish predators (Atlantic striped bass Morone saxatilis, Atlantic cod Gadus morhua, and sea raven Hemitripterus americanus) separately in experimental mesocosm tanks. Juvenile lobsters moved less and spent more time in shelter when in the presence of cod or sea raven. By contrast, striped bass did not induce lobsters to alter their behavior. Striped bass are highly mobile, active pursuit predators, which are thought to induce weaker behavioral responses in prey than sit-and-pursue predators like sea ravens. Thus, differences in lobster sheltering behavior corresponded with differences in predator foraging behavior. These predator-induced changes in behavior can result in less foraging activity, which may translate into reduced lobster growth and reproduction. Efforts to model marine communities and ecosystems will benefit from a more holistic understanding of whether predators induced prey to modify their foraging behavior and habitat usage. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据