4.8 Article

RIPK1 Regulates RIPK3-MLKL-Driven Systemic Inflammation and Emergency Hematopoiesis

期刊

CELL
卷 157, 期 5, 页码 1175-1188

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.04.019

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHMRC [1016647, 461221, 1016701, 1025594, 1046984, 1046010, 1025239, 637367, 1008131, 1057905]
  2. Australian Research Council Fellowship
  3. APA scholarship
  4. Dora Lush Scholarship
  5. La Trobe University Postgraduate Research Scholarship
  6. VESKI innovation fellowship
  7. ARC Fellowship
  8. Cancer Council Victoria Carden Fellowship
  9. NHMRC fellowships [541901, 1058344, 637309]
  10. Australian Cancer Research Fund, Victorian State Government Operational Infrastructure Support
  11. NHMRC IRIISS grant [361646]
  12. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1057905] Funding Source: NHMRC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Upon ligand binding, RIPK1 is recruited to tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily (TNFRSF) and Toll-like receptor (TLR) complexes promoting prosurvival and inflammatory signaling. RIPK1 also directly regulates caspase-8-mediated apoptosis or, if caspase-8 activity is blocked, RIPK3-MLKL-dependent necroptosis. We show that C57BL/6 Ripk1(-/-) mice die at birth of systemic inflammation that was not transferable by the hematopoietic compartment. However, Ripk1(-/-) progenitors failed to engraft lethally irradiated hosts properly. Blocking TNF reversed this defect in emergency hematopoiesis but, surprisingly, Tnfr1 deficiency did not prevent inflammation in Ripk1(-/-) neonates. Deletion of Ripk3 or Mlkl, but not Casp8, prevented extracellular release of the necroptotic DAMP, IL-33, and reduced Myd88-dependent inflammation. Reduced inflammation in the Ripk1(-/-) Ripk3(-/-), Ripk1(-/-)Mlkl(-/-), and Ripk1(-/-)Myd88(-/-) mice prevented neonatal lethality, but only Ripk1(-/-)Ripk3(-/-)Casp8(-/-) mice survived past weaning. These results reveal a key function for RIPK1 in inhibiting necroptosis and, thereby, a role in limiting, not only promoting, inflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据