4.2 Article

Merosin-deficient congenital muscular dystrophy with mental retardation and cerebellar cysts, unlinked to the LAMA2, FCMD, MEB and CMD1B loci, in three Tunisian patients

期刊

NEUROMUSCULAR DISORDERS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 4-12

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0960-8966(02)00188-8

关键词

congenital muscular dystrophy; magnetic resonance imaging; cerebellar cysts; secondary merosin deficiency; mental retardation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report three Tunisian patients affected by congenital muscular dystrophy with mental retardation and cerebellar cysts on cranial magnetic resonance imaging. The clinical features were characterized by hypotonia at birth, joint contractures associated with severe psychomotor retardation, absence of speech, inability to walk in three patients, but calf hypertrophy was noted only in two patients. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed several cerebellar cysts and vermis hypoplasia in all of the patients. Abnormality of the white matter was present in two patients. The pattern of gyration was normal in all cases. Serum creatine kinase was elevated in all three cases and their muscle biopsy showed dystrophic changes compatible with congenital muscular dystrophy. The immunohistochemical analysis of the skeletal muscle revealed partial merosin deficiency, more pronounced for the N-terminal antibody. Linkage analysis excluded congenital muscular dystrophy loci on chromosomes 6q22, 9q31, 1p32 and 1q42. These patients constituted a particular form of congenital muscular dystrophy with a combination of severe motor delay, mental retardation, partial merosin deficiency and cerebellar cysts. Two patients showed white matter abnormalities on magnetic resonance imaging and hypertrophy of the calves. These cases, in addition to those reported previously, confirmed the large phenotypic variability in the group of secondary merosin deficiency congenital muscular dystrophy. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据