Tadpoles' responses to risk of fish introduction

The introduction of predatory species, such as fish, in amphibian breeding sites is one of the many likely causes of amphibian population decline. The existence of inducible or constitutive (permanent) defences is expected to temper the lethal effects of fish on tadpoles. According to current theories on the evolution of phenotypic plasticity, the amphibian species that occur in habitats that are mostly or often fish-free were expected to display inducible defences, while the species that reproduce mainly in fish ponds ought to present constitutive defences. The tested species were Rana dalmatina, Hyla arborea and R. ridibunda, respectively. As expected, R. ridibunda tadpoles were less vulnerable to fish predation than the other species. Nevertheless, all three species exhibited morphological responses in the presence of fish. Their increases in tail area and decreases in body depth were similar. However, behaviour was only modified in R. dalmatina, which exhibited lower activity rates and higher refuge use in the presence of fish cues. Such lower activity rates were related to lower growth and developmental rates. While not detected in this experiment, the existence of inducible defences in the three species suggests the existence of costs of antipredator defence. Those costs may have delayed effects so that increasing the frequency of fish ponds may exacerbate the impact of delayed costs whatever the species, suggesting that the dynamics of species that are not fish-adverse could also suffer from the introduction of fish.