4.7 Article

Bioactive coatings of endovascular stents based on polyelectrolyte multilayers

期刊

BIOMACROMOLECULES
卷 4, 期 6, 页码 1564-1571

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bm0341834

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Layer-by-layer self-assembly of two polysaccharides, hyaluronan (HA) and chitosan (CH), was employed to engineer bioactive coatings for endovascular stents. A polyethyleneimine (PEI) primer layer was adsorbed on the metallic surface to initiate the sequential adsorption of the weak polyelectrolytes. The multilayer growth was monitored using a radiolabeled HA and shown to be linear as a function of the number of layers. The chemical structure, inter-facial properties, and morphology of the self-assembled multilayer were investigated by time-of-flight secondary ions mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS), contact angle measurements, and atomic force microscopy (AFM), respectively. Multilayer-coated NiTi disks presented enhanced antifouling properties, compared to unmodified NiTi disks, as demonstrated by a decrease of platelet adhesion in an in vitro assay (38% reduction; p = 0.036). An ex vivo assay on a porcine model indicated that the coating did not prevent fouling by neutrophils. To assess whether the multilayers may be exploited as in situ drug delivery systems, the nitric-oxide-donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP) was incorporated within the multilayer. SNP-doped multilayers were shown to further reduce platelet adhesion, compared to standard multilayers (40% reduction). When NiTi wires coated with a multilayer containing a fluorescently labeled HA were placed in intimate contact with the vascular wall, the polysaccharide translocated on the porcine aortic samples, as shown by confocal microscopy observation of a treated artery. The enhanced thromboresistance of the self-assembled multilayer together with the antiinflammatory and wound healing properties of hyaluronan and chitosan are expected to reduce the neointimal hyperplasia associated with stent implantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据