4.8 Article

A Landscape of Driver Mutations in Melanoma

期刊

CELL
卷 150, 期 2, 页码 251-263

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.024

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHGRI [U54 HG003067]
  2. Melanoma Research Alliance
  3. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Melanoma Specialized Programs of Research Excellence and Melanoma Informatics, Tissue Resource, and Pathology [P50 CA93459]
  4. NCI [CA-16672, R33CA126674, R01 CA093947]
  5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation [PASMP3_134379/1]
  7. G. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers Charitable Foundation
  8. FWF-Austrian Science Fund [L590-B12]
  9. NIH [DP2OD002750]
  10. Starr Cancer Consortium
  11. TCGA GDAC [U24 CA143845]
  12. Milestein Innovation Award in Melanoma Research
  13. Novartis
  14. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [L590] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  15. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [L 590] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite recent insights into melanoma genetics, systematic surveys for driver mutations are challenged by an abundance of passenger mutations caused by carcinogenic UV light exposure. We developed a permutation-based framework to address this challenge, employing mutation data from intronic sequences to control for passenger mutational load on a per gene basis. Analysis of large-scale melanoma exome data by this approach discovered six novel melanoma genes (PPP6C, RAC1, SNX31, TACC1, STK19, and ARID2), three of which-RAC1, PPP6C, and STK19-harbored recurrent and potentially targetable mutations. Integration with chromosomal copy number data contextualized the landscape of driver mutations, providing oncogenic insights in BRAF- and NRAS-driven melanoma as well as those without known NRAS/BRAF mutations. The landscape also clarified a mutational basis for RB and p53 pathway deregulation in this malignancy. Finally, the spectrum of driver mutations provided unequivocal genomic evidence for a direct mutagenic role of UV light in melanoma pathogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据