4.3 Article

Intravenous n-acetylcysteine, ascorbic acid and selenium-based anti-oxidant therapy in severe acute pancreatitis

期刊

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 38, 期 12, 页码 1262-1267

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00365520310006540

关键词

acute pancreatitis; anti-oxidant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: To observe outcome in a cohort of patients with severe acute pancreatitis receiving multiple anti-oxidant therapy. Methods: An observational study was carried out in 46 consecutive patients with acute pancreatitis fulfilling current Atlanta consensus criteria for severe disease. All patients received multiple anti-oxidant therapy based on intravenous selenium, N-acetylcysteine and ascorbic acid plus beta-carotene and alpha-tocopherol delivered via nasogastric tube. Principal outcomes were the effect of anti-oxidant supplementation on anti-oxidant levels, morbidity and mortality in patients on anti-oxidant therapy, case-control analysis of observed survival compared to predicted survival derived from logistic organ dysfunction score (LODS), logistic regression analysis of factors influencing outcome and side effect profile of anti-oxidant therapy. Results: Paired baseline and post-supplementation data were available for 25 patients and revealed that anti-oxidant supplementation restored vitamin C ( P = 0.003) and selenium ( P = 0.028) toward normal. In univariate survival analysis, patient survival to discharge was best predicted by admission APACHE-II score with relative risk of death increasing 12.6% for each unit increase (95% CI 6.0% to 19.6%). The mean LODS calculated on admission to hospital was 3.7 ( standard error of the mean 4.1) giving a predicted mortality for the cohort of 21%. The observed in-hospital mortality was 43%. Conclusions: Case-control analyses do not appear to demonstrate any benefit from the multiple anti-oxidant combination of selenium, N-acetylcysteine and ascorbic acid in severe acute pancreatitis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据