4.5 Article

CCP1-4 of the C4b-binding protein alpha-chain are required for factor I mediated cleavage of complement factor C3b

期刊

MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY
卷 39, 期 10, 页码 547-556

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0161-5890(02)00213-4

关键词

complement; complement regulatory proteins; C4b-binding protein; factor I; complement control protein (CCP) domains

向作者/读者索取更多资源

C4b-binding protein (C4BP) is a potent regulator of the complement system because it strongly inhibits the classical pathway of complement. Furthermore, C4BP serves as a cofactor to factor I (FI) in the cleavage of fluid phase C3b and can, therefore, influence the alternative pathway of complement. The major form of C4BP in plasma consists of seven identical alpha-chains and one beta-chain. Both types of subunits are composed of complement control protein (CCP) domains, eight such domains make up one alpha-chain. To elucidate the structural requirements for the interaction between Ob and the alpha-chain, nineteen recombinant C4BP variants were used: six truncated monomeric variants, nine polymeric variants in which individual CCPs were deleted, and finally four variants in which double alanine residues were introduced between CCPs. We found that C4BP requires all four N-terminal CCPs of the alpha-chain, with CCP2 and 3 being the most important, to act as a cofactor in the cleavage of C3b. Also, a cluster of positively charged amino acids on the interface between CCP1 and 2 is involved in the binding. Compared to the interaction with C4b, we conclude that binding of Ob to C4BP requires larger molecular surface on C4BP. We found that C4BP was able to act as cofactor in degradation of surface bound Ob and to accelerate decay of alternative C3-convertase. However, in both cases 1000-fold molar excess of C4BP over factor H (FH), well known inhibitor of the alternative pathway, was required to obtain the same effect. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据