4.8 Article

DNA Damage in Oocytes Induces a Switch of the Quality Control Factor TAp63α from Dimer to Tetramer

期刊

CELL
卷 144, 期 4, 页码 566-576

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.01.013

关键词

-

资金

  1. DFG [DO 545/2-1]
  2. EU [LSHB-CT-019067]
  3. Centre for Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance (BMRZ)
  4. Cluster of Excellence Frankfurt (Macromolecular Complexes)
  5. ANR
  6. ERC
  7. Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds PhD Fellowship
  8. Canadian Institutes for Health Research [1097737]
  9. Canadian Foundation for Innovation
  10. Genome Canada through the Ontario Genomics Institute
  11. GlaxoSmithKline
  12. Karolinska Institutet
  13. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  14. Ontario Innovation Trust
  15. Ontario Ministry for Research and Innovation
  16. Merck Co., Inc.
  17. Novartis Research Foundation
  18. Swedish Agency for Innovation Systems
  19. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
  20. Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TAp63 alpha, a homolog of the p53 tumor suppressor, is a quality control factor in the female germline. Remarkably, already undamaged oocytes express high levels of the protein, suggesting that TAp63 alpha's activity is under tight control of an inhibitory mechanism. Biochemical studies have proposed that inhibition requires the C-terminal transactivation inhibitory domain. However, the structural mechanism of TAp63 alpha inhibition remains unknown. Here, we show that TAp63 alpha is kept in an inactive dimeric state. We reveal that relief of inhibition leads to tetramer formation with similar to 20-fold higher DNA affinity. In vivo, phosphorylation-triggered tetramerization of TAp63 alpha is not reversible by dephosphorylation. Furthermore, we show that a helix in the oligomerization domain of p63 is crucial for tetramer stabilization and competes with the transactivation domain for the same binding site. Our results demonstrate how TAp63 alpha is inhibited by complex domain-domain interactions that provide the basis for regulating quality control in oocytes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据