4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Homocysteine, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism and the B-vitamins: A facet of nature-nurture interplay

期刊

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE
卷 41, 期 4, 页码 547-553

出版社

WALTER DE GRUYTER & CO
DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2003.083

关键词

hyperhomocysteinemia; vitamin B-12; folate; methylmalonic acid; MTHFR mutation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677 (MTHFR 677) polymorphism may provoke hyperhomocysteinemia when folate status is low. The influence of MTHFR 677 mutation on homocysteine (HCY) levels in relation to vitamin B12 and folate status was investigated in the current study. Subjects and methods: 113 vegetarians, 123 omnivorous Germans, and 117 omnivorous Syrians were recruited. MTHFR 677 genotype, HCY, methylmalonic acid (MMA), total serum vitamin B12, serum folate, and vitamin B6 were determined using conventional methods. Results: Omnivorous Germans displayed the lowest HCY levels compared with vegetarians and Syrians (median 8.0, 10.4, and 11.3 mol/l, respectively). The highest serum folate and the highest MMA levels were found in vegetarians (median folate = 30.0; MMA = 355 nmol/l). Among vegetarians and Syrians, TT subjects had higher HCY levels than other genotypes which were, however, no longer significant in the highest folate tertiles. When the data were pooled, the odds ratio (OR, 95% CI) for HCY > 12 mol/l was 3.81 (1.559.34) in TT compared with CC subjects. The OR increased to 28.85 (4.63179.62) in TT subjects who had folate in the lowest tertile, and to 21.84 (4.8199.1) in TT subjects who had MMA in the highest MMA tertile. Conclusion: MTHFR 677 TT individuals are more liable to hyperhomocysteinemia under vitamin B12 deficiency than the other two genotypes. In such a case, relative folate shortage may progressively increase HCY levels. TT individuals may have increased folate and vitamin B12 requirements compared to the other CC and CT genotypes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据