4.8 Article

Distinct Factors Control Histone Variant H3.3 Localization at Specific Genomic Regions

期刊

CELL
卷 140, 期 5, 页码 678-691

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.003

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [GM07739, RR00862, RR022220, DP1DA026192, GM53122, GM53512]
  2. Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation
  3. Rockefeller University
  4. Starr Foundation
  5. New York State Department of Health [C023046]
  6. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council UK
  8. British Heart Foundation
  9. Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University
  10. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E009603/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. Medical Research Council [G1000801b, MC_U137961147, G1000801j] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. BBSRC [BB/E009603/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  13. MRC [MC_U137961147] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The incorporation of histone H3 variants has been implicated in the epigenetic memory of cellular state. Using genome editing with zinc-finger nucleases to tag endogenous H3.3, we report genome-wide profiles of H3 variants in mammalian embryonic stem cells and neuronal precursor cells. Genome-wide patterns of H3.3 are dependent on amino acid sequence and change with cellular differentiation at developmentally regulated loci. The H3.3 chaperone Hira is required for H3.3 enrichment at active and repressed genes. Strikingly, Hira is not essential for localization of H3.3 at telomeres and many transcription factor binding sites. Immunoaffinity purification and mass spectrometry reveal that the proteins Atrx and Daxx associate with H3.3 in a Hira-independent manner. Atrx is required for Hira-independent localization of H3.3 at telomeres and for the repression of telomeric RNA. Our data demonstrate that multiple and distinct factors are responsible for H3.3 localization at specific genomic locations in mammalian cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据