4.6 Article

Hypophosphatemia during nutritional rehabilitation in anorexia nervosa: Implications for refeeding and monitoring

期刊

JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH
卷 32, 期 1, 页码 83-88

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1054-139X(02)00456-1

关键词

adolescents; anorexia nervosa; hypophosphatemia; phosphorus; refeeding syndrome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To determine the incidence of hypophosphatemia in adolescents with anorexia nervosa (AN) hospitalized for nutritional rehabilitation and to examine factors predisposing to its development. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 69 patients (66 female, 3 male) with AN consecutively admitted to an inpatient adolescent medical unit between July 1, 1998 and June 30, 2000. Mean age was 15.5 +/- 2.4 (range 8 to 22) years and mean % ideal body weight (IBW) was 72.7 +/- 7%. Serum phosphorus was measured daily for 1 week and then biweekly to weekly. Patients were started on 1200-1400 kcal/day and calories were increased by 200 kcal every 24-48 hours. Results: Four (5.8%) patients developed moderate hypophosphatemia (< 2.5 and greater than or equal to 1.0 mg/dl) and 15 (21.7%) had mild hypophosphatemia (< 3.0 and greater than or equal to 2.5 mg/dl). Patients who developed moderate hypophosphatemia were significantly more malnourished than those who did not (p = 0.02). Phosphorus nadirs were directly proportional to % IBW (r = 0.3, p = 0.01). Over three-quarters of the patients (81%) reached their phosphorus nadir within the first week of hospitalization. The patient with the lowest phosphorus level experienced short runs of ventricular tachycardia. No other severe complications were seen. Overall, 19 (27.5%) patients required phosphorus supplementation. Conclusions: Phosphorus drops to its nadir during the first week of refeeding. We recommend daily monitoring of serum phosphorus with supplementation as needed during the first week of hospitalization, especially in those who are severely malnourished. (C) Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2003.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据