4.5 Article

The fundamental role of increased production of nitric oxide in lipopolysaccharide-induced embryonic resorption in mice

期刊

REPRODUCTION
卷 125, 期 1, 页码 95-110

出版社

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/rep.0.1250095

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitric oxide (NO) fulfils important functions during pregnancy and has a role in implantation, decidualization, vasodilatation and myometrial relaxation. However, at high concentrations, such as those that are produced in sepsis, No has toxic effects as it is a free radical. The aim of this study was to characterize uterine and decidual NO production in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)induced embryonic resorption in mice and to determine which isoforms of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) take part. LPS produced 100% embryonic resorption at 24h, with complete fetus expulsions at 48h. Decidual and uterine NO production were increased by LPS, with maximum production at 6h. This increase was due to the induction of expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) isoform in the decidua and uterus, and neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) isoform in the decidua, as detected by western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry. LPS increased iNOS expression in decidual and myometrial cells and increased nNOS expression in decidual cells. In addition, LPS caused fibrinolysis and infiltration of mesometrial decidua by macrophages positive for iNOS and CD14 (LPS receptor). Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) was found in decidual and uterine arteries but LPS did not modify its expression. LPS induced CD14 expression in endometrial glands, and this could have amplified the inflammatory response. Aminoguanidine, an inhibitor of iNOS activity, totally reversed the LPS-induced embryonic resorption. This result could be explained by an inhibition of the increase in NO production but also by an inhibition of the cellular infiltration and fibrinolysis. These results show that NO fulfils a fundamental role in LPS-induced embryonic resorption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据