4.7 Article

Quantitative speciation of selenium in human serum by affinity chromatography coupled to post-column isotope dilution analysis ICP-MS

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY
卷 18, 期 10, 页码 1210-1216

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b305455a

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A post-column isotope dilution analysis (IDA) methodology has been applied to carry out the quantitative speciation of selenium in human serum by affinity chromatography coupled to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) with an octapole reaction system (ORS). The interfering argon dimers on the Se-78 and Se-80 isotopes were suppressed by pressurizing the octapole chamber with hydrogen. The separation of the selenium-containing proteins was evaluated both by anion exchange chromatography (Mono Q HR 5/5) and affinity chromatography (Hi-Trap Heparin- and Hi-Trap Blue-Sepharose columns). Quantification of selenium was performed by post-column isotope dilution analysis by continuous mixing of an enriched Se-77 spike solution with the eluent from the column. Finally, the Se-78/Se-77 or Se-80/Se-77 isotope ratios were monitored and the amount of selenium bound to proteins was evaluated. The chromatographic separation of selenium-containing proteins in human serum by anion exchange chromatography was not satisfactory. On the other hand, the use of affinity chromatography allowed for a rapid, precise and convenient fractionation of those proteins. Three main selenium fractions could be separated and quantified: selenoprotein P, albumin and glutathione peroxidase. Mass balance performed under different experimental conditions showed quantitative selenium recovery. The proposed methodology was used to study qualitative and quantitative speciation of selenium in human serum samples from healthy volunteers and patients on haemodialysis. The distribution of selenium between plasma glutathione peroxidase (similar to20%), selenoprotein P (similar to55%) and albumin (similar to20%) was similar in both populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据