4.3 Article

Evaluation of the use of BioGlue (R) in neurosurgical procedures

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 661-664

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0967-5868(03)00163-2

关键词

bilge; cerebrospinal fluid fistula; dural closure; fibrin sealant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Post-operative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistula following neurosurgery is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This prospective study evaluates the efficacy of a new bioadhesive - BioGlue, as a dural sealant in preventing CSF fistula. The complications associated with its use are investigated and the literature regarding dural closure reviewed. Methods: BioGlue was applied to the dura mater as a sealant in 210 patients undergoing 216 neurosurgical procedures over a period of 22 months at the Royal Melbourne Hospital. It was used where watertight closure of the dura mater could not be ensured by primary suture alone and for reconstruction of the sellar floor following transsphenoidal aderohypophysectomy. It was used in 114 supratentorial (52.7%), 53 infratentorial (24.5%) craniotomies, 41 (18.9%) transsphenoidal aderfohypophysectomies and 8 spinal (3.7%) procedures. The incidence of CSF fistula as a complication of surgery with intradural exposure was analysed. Results: The incidence of CSF fistula post-operatively was significantly low. Two patients (0.93%), both having undergone posterior fossa craniotomy - for evacuation of a cerebellar haematoma and redo excision of a metastasis respectively and both complicated by hydrocephalus, developed CSF fistula. There were no complications associated with the use of BioGlue. Conclusion: BioGlue reduced the incidence of complications associated with neurosurgery. It is an effective adjunct in dural closure to prevent CSF fistula with enhanced bonding properties and is simple to use. In this study there were no complications associated with its use. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据