4.3 Article

Simplicial edge representation of protein structures and alpha contact potential with confidence measure

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/prot.10442

关键词

simplicial edge; alpha contact; alpha shape; protein potential function; bootstrap

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein representation and potential function are two important ingredients for studying protein folding, equilibrium thermodynamics, and sequence design. We introduce a novel geometric representation of protein contact interactions using the edge simplices from the alpha shape of the protein structure. This representation can eliminate implausible neighbors that are not in physical contact, and can avoid spurious contact between two residues when a third residue is between them. We developed statistical alpha contact potential using an odds-ratio model. A studentized bootstrap method was then introduced to assess the 95% confidence intervals for each of the 210 propensity parameters. We found, with confidence, that there is significant long-range propensity (>30 residues apart) for hydrophobic interactions. We tested alpha contact potential for native structure discrimination using several sets of decoy structures, and found that it often performs comparably with atom-based potentials requiring many more parameters. We also show that accurate geometric representation is important, and that alpha contact potential has better performance than potential defined by cutoff distance between geometric centers of side chains. Hierarchical clustering of alpha contact potentials reveals natural grouping of residues. To explore the relationship between shape and physicochemical representations, we tested the minimum alphabet size necessary for native structure discrimination. We found that there is no significant difference in performance of discrimination when alphabet size varies from 7 to 20, if geometry is represented accurately by alpha simplicial edges. This result suggests that the geometry of packing plays an important role, but the specific residue types are often interchangeable. (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据