4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Characteristics of non-allophanic andisols with hydric properties from the Ecuadorian paramos

期刊

GEODERMA
卷 117, 期 3-4, 页码 267-281

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00128-9

关键词

andisols; paramos; Ecuador

向作者/读者索取更多资源

So far, the occurrence of hydric properties (i.e. water retention values at 1500 kPa matrix potential larger than 1000 g kg(-1)) has generally been reported in Andisols characterised by advanced stages of weathering. Moreover, as these properties are due to the presence of short-range-ordered (SRO) minerals, they are frequently better expressed in the subsurface than in the surface horizons of these Andisols. The present paper describes the characteristics of three Hydric Melanudands whose properties distinctly depart from those briefly summarised above. These soils have been found in some of high-altitude (3200-4000 m a.s.l.) paramos of Ecuador where they are likely to cover several thousands of km(2). They either derived from or have been rejuvenated by volcanic ash deposited more recently than 3000 years BP and they develop under climatic and vegetation conditions favouring exceptionally large accumulations of organic matter. As a consequence, the deep (50-80 cm) epipedons of these Melanudands exhibit an unusual combination of properties. Though rich in primary weatherable minerals and virtually devoid of allophane, these epipedons have nevertheless 1500 kPa water contents either close to or even much larger than 1000 g kg(-1). In these Hydric Melanudands, organic colloids are the constituents responsible for their large porosity. Hydric Andisols are known to experience important irreversible physical changes on drying and this behaviour, in turn, makes them very fragile. As the hydric properties occur here in surface horizons, these paramos soils are thus expected to be especially susceptible to any land use change. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据