4.3 Article

Rapid clinical progression to diagnosis among African-American men with systemic lupus erythematosus

期刊

LUPUS
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 99-106

出版社

ARNOLD, HODDER HEADLINE PLC
DOI: 10.1191/0961203303lu334oa

关键词

African-American; autoantibodies; ethnicity; gender; lupus; SLE

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R37AI024717, R01AI024717, R01AI031584] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [K08AR001981, P50AR045231, R03AR045084, R01AR042460] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NIAID NIH HHS [AI31584, AI24717] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR45231, AR01981, AR42460, AR45084] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The initial clinical course of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is variable, ranging from relatively minor manifestations progressing over years to rapid onset of fulminate disease. We sought to identify factors associated with the rapid manifestation of SLE. Chart review of military medical records was used to identify 130 patients who met the American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for SLE. Demographics, clinical criteria date of occurrence, and the date of SLE classification (at least four clinical criteria) met were documented. Prospectively stored serum samples prior to the diagnosis were evaluated for SLE autoantibodies. Median time from the first recorded criteria to diagnosis was significantly shorter in African-American (AA) males compared with AA females and European American (EA) females and males combined. AA males were more likely to have nephritis as their first clinical symptom. Also, less time transpired between the first clinical criterion and SLE diagnosis in AA males with nephritis than in other groups presenting with nephritis. Even when cases presenting with nephritis were excluded, a diagnosis of SLE was made more rapidly in AA males. African-American men progress from initial clinical manifestations to SLE diagnosis more rapidly than other ethnic or gender groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据