4.5 Article

A novel autosomal recessive non-syndromic deafness locus (DFNB35) maps to 14q24.1-14q24.3 in large consanguineous kindred from Pakistan

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 77-80

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200905

关键词

autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss; DFNA9; DFNA23; DFNB5; DFNB35; 14q24.1-14q24.3 prelingual; Pakistan

资金

  1. NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE [N01HG065403] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS [R29DC003594, R01DC003594] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NHGRI NIH HHS [N01HG65403] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDCD NIH HHS [R01 DC003594, DC03594, R29 DC003594-02, R29 DC003594] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic deafness is one of the most frequent forms of inherited hearing impairment. Over 30 autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss loci have been mapped, and 15 genes have been isolated. Of the over 30 reported autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss (NSHL) loci, the typical phenotype is prelingual non-progressive severe to profound hearing loss with the exception of DFNB8, which displays postlingual onset and DFNB13, which is progressive. In this report we describe a large inbred kindred from a remote area of Pakistan, comprising six generations and segregating autosomal recessive nonsyndromic prelingual deafness. DNA samples from 24 individuals were used for genome wide screen and fine mapping. Linkage analysis indicates that in this family the NSHL locus, (DFNB35) maps to a 17.54 cM region on chromosome 14 flanked by markers D14S57 and D14S59. Examination of haplotypes reveals a region that is homozygous for 11.75 cM spanning between markers D14S588 and D14S59. A maximum two-point LOD score of 5.3 and multipoint LOD score of 7.6 was obtained at marker D14S53. The interval for DFNB35 does not overlap with the regions for DFNA9, DFNA23 or DFN85.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据