4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Rosetta predictions in CASP5: Successes, failures, and prospects for complete automation

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/prot.10552

关键词

protein structure prediction; fragment insertion; ROSETTA; CASP; full-atom refinement

资金

  1. NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE [T32HG000035] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [F32AR008558] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NHGRI NIH HHS [T32 HG 00035] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR08558] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe predictions of the structures of CASP5 targets using Rosetta. The Rosetta fragment insertion protocol was used to generate models for entire target domains without detectable sequence similarity to a protein of known structure and to build long loop insertions (and N- and C-terminal extensions) in cases where a structural template was available. Encouraging results were obtained both for the de novo predictions and for the long loop insertions; we describe here the successes as well as the failures in the context of current efforts to improve the Rosetta method. In particular, de novo predictions failed for large proteins that were incorrectly parsed into domains and for topologically complex (high contact order) proteins with swapping of segments between domains. However, for the remaining targets, at least one of the five submitted models had a long fragment with significant similarity to the native structure. A fully automated version of the CASP5 protocol produced results that were comparable to the human-assisted predictions for most of the targets, suggesting that automated genomic-scale, de novo protein structure prediction may soon be worthwhile. For the three targets where the human-assisted predictions were significantly closer to the native structure, we identify the steps that remain to be automated. (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据