4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Role of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris in the development of a disinfectant taint in shelf-stable fruit juice

期刊

LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 9-14

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2003.01251.x

关键词

2,6-dibromophenol; 2,6-dichlorophenol; Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris; disinfectant taint; fruit juice; halophenols

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: This study was undertaken to identify the bacterium and metabolic products contributing to a disinfectant taint in shelf-stable fruit juice and to determine some of the growth conditions for the organism. Methods and Results: Microbiological examination of tainted and untainted fruit juice drinks detected low numbers of acid-dependent, thermotolerant, spore-forming bacteria in the tainted juices only. The presence of omega-cyclohexyl fatty acids was confirmed in two of the isolates by cell membrane fatty acid analysis. The isolates were subsequently identified as Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris by partial 16S rDNA sequencing. Studies on the isolates showed growth at pH 2.5-6.0 and 19.5-58degreesC. Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) was used to identify and quantify 2,6-dibromophenol (2,6-DBP) and 2,6-dichlorophenol (2,6-DCP) in the tainted juice. Challenge studies in a mixed fruit drink inoculated with the two isolates and the type strain of A. acidoterrestris , incubated at 44-46degreesC for 4 d, showed the production of both metabolites, which were confirmed and quantified by GC/MS. Conclusions: The results show that A. acidoterrestris can produce 2,6-DBP and 2,6-DCP in shelf-stable juices. Significance and Impact of the Study: This is the first report detailing experimental methodology showing that A. acidoterrestris can produce 2,6-DCP in foods. Control of storage temperatures (to < 20degreesC) immediately after processing may provide an effective control measure for the fruit juice industry to prevent spoilage by A. acidoterrestris .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据