4.3 Article

A pilot randomized trial of induced blood pressure elevation: Effects on function and focal perfusion in acute and subacute stroke

期刊

CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 236-246

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000071122

关键词

cerebrovascular disease/stroke; aphasia; hemispatial neglect

资金

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [R01 DC05375] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS [R01DC005375] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Small, unrandomized studies have indicated that pharmacologically induced blood pressure elevation may improve function in ischemic stroke, presumably by improving blood flow to ischemic, but non-infarcted tissue (which may be indicated by diffusion-perfusion mismatch on MRI). We conducted a pilot, randomized trial to evaluate effects of pharmacologically induced blood pressure elevation on function and perfusion in acute stroke. Methods: Consecutive series of patients with large diffusion-perfusion mismatch were randomly assigned to induced blood pressure elevation ('treated' patients, n = 9) or conventional management ('untreated' patients, n = 6). Results: There were no significant differences between groups at baseline. NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores were lower (better) in treated versus untreated patients at day 3 (mean 5.6 vs. 12.3; p = 0.01) and week 6-8 (mean 2.8 vs. 9.7; p < 0.04). Treated (but not untreated) patients showed significant improvement from day 1 to day 3 in NIHSS score (from mean 10.2 to 5.6; p < 0.002), cognitive score (from mean 58.7 to 27.9% errors; p < 0.002), and volume of hypoperfused tissue (mean 132 to 58 ml; p < 0.02). High Pearson correlations between the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and accuracy on daily cognitive tests indicated that functional changes were due to changes in MAP. Conclusion: Results warrant a full-scale, double-blind clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and risk of induced blood pressure elevation in selective patients with acute/subacute stroke. Copyright (C) 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据