4.6 Article

Common variations in noncoding regions of the human natriuretic peptide receptor A gene have quantitative effects

期刊

HUMAN GENETICS
卷 112, 期 1, 页码 62-70

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00439-002-0834-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL49277, HL62845, R01 HL049277, R37 HL042630, R01 HL062845-02] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL062845, R01HL049277, R37HL042630] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genetic susceptibility to common conditions, such as essential hypertension and cardiac hypertrophy, is probably determined by various combinations of small quantitative changes in the expression of many genes. NPR1, coding for natriuretic peptide receptor A (N-PRA), is a potential candidate, because NPRA mediates natriuretic, diuretic, and vasorelaxing actions of the nariuretic peptides, and because genetically determined quantitative changes in the expression of this gene affect blood pressure and heart weight in a dose-dependent manner in mice. To determine whether there are common quantitative variants in human NPR1, we have sequenced the entire human NPR1 gene and identified 10 polymorphic sites in its non-coding sequence by using DNA from 34 unrelated human individuals. Five of the sites are single nucleotide polymorphisms; the remaining five are length polymorphisms, including a highly variable complex dinucleotide repeat in intron 19. There are three common haplotypes 5' to this dinucleotide repeat and three 3' to it, but the 5' haplotypes and 3' haplotypes appear to be randomly associated. Transient expression analysis in cultured cells of reporter plasmids with the proximal promoter sequences of NPR1 and its 3' untranslated regions showed that these polymorphisms have functional effects. We conclude that common NPR1 alleles can alter expression of the gene as much as two-fold and could therefore significantly affect genetic risks for essential hypertension and cardiac hypertrophy in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据