4.2 Article

Experimental study on bone formation potential of cryopreserved human bone marrow mesenchymal cell/hydroxyapatite complex in the presence of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 108-116

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200301000-00021

关键词

rhBMP-2; hydroxyapatite; bone marrow cell; bone formation

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Secondary bone grafting in the alveolar cleft is one of the most important treatment modalities for patients with a cleft lip and palate. In children, however, harvesting a sufficient amount of bone graft from the donor site is difficult, and the procedure imposes a heavy burden on the patients. This problem may be resolved if autologous transplantation can be performed using a cell-hybrid type of artificial bone prepared with the patient's own bone marrow cells through a tissue engineering technique. In the current study, we examined the possibility of achieving such an autologous transplantation using cryopreserved human bone marrow cells. Human bone marrow cells were grown in culture and cryopreserved, and the cells preserved for 3 years and the cells preserved for 3 months were then thawed and recultivated. In one experiment, the recultivated cells were seeded onto a complex composed of porous hydroxyapatite and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), and the complex was grafted subcutaneously in nude mice. In another experiment, the cells were seeded onto the porous hydroxyapatite and cultivated for 10 days before grafting in a medium supplemented with BMP. The bone formation potential of the cells was compared between these two experiments. Formation of mature bone was observed 2 weeks after transplantation in the former experiment, whereas only scarce bone formation was evident 4 weeks after transplantation in the latter experiment. It is therefore assumed that exposing the cultured human bone marrow cells to a high concentration of BMP in vivo strongly promotes bone formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据