4.4 Article

Neural substrates of response-based sequence learning using fMRI

期刊

JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 127-138

出版社

MIT PRESS
DOI: 10.1162/089892904322755610

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [MH 65598] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS 33504, NS 40106] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH065598] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS033504, R01NS040106] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Representation of sequential structure can occur with respect to the order of perceptual events or the order in which actions are linked. Neural correlates of sequence retrieval associated with the order of motor responses were identified in a variant of the serial reaction time task in which training occurred with a spatially incompatible mapping between stimuli and finger responses. After transfer to a spatially compatible version of the task, performance enhancements indicative of learning were only present in subjects required to make finger movements in the same order used during training. In contrast, a second group of subjects performed the compatible task using an identical sequence of stimuli (and different order of finger movements) as in training. They demonstrated no performance benefit, indicating that learning was response based. Analysis was restricted to subjects demonstrating low recall of the sequence structure to rule out effects of explicit awareness. The interaction of group (motor vs. perceptual transfer) with sequence retrieval (sequencing vs. rest) revealed significantly greater activation in the bilateral supplementary motor area, cingulate motor area, ventral premotor cortex, left caudate, and inferior parietal lobule for subjects in the motor group (illustrating successful sequence retrieval at the response level). Retrieval of sequential responses occurs within mesial motor areas and related motor planning areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据