3.8 Review

The epicardium and epicardially derived cells (EPDCs) as cardiac stem cells

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/ar.a.10129

关键词

epicardium; epicardially-derived cells; heart; stem cells; coronary vasculogenesis

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01 HL52813] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [P01 HD39946] Funding Source: Medline
  3. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH &HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [P01HD039946] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [P01HL052813] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

After its initial formation the epicardium forms the outermost cell layer of the heart. As a result of an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transformation (EMT) individual cells delaminate from this primitive epicardial epithelium and migrate into the subepicardial space (Perez-Pomares et al., Dev Dyn 1997; 210: 96-105; Histochem J 1998a;30:627-634). Several studies have demonstrated that these epicardially derived cells (EPDCs) subsequently invade myocardial and valvuloseptal tissues (Mikawa and Fischman, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:9504-9508; Mikawa and Gourdie, Dev Biol 1996;174:221-232; Dettman et al., Dev Biol 1998;193:169-181; Gittenberger de Groot et al., Cire Res 1998;82:1043-1052; Manner, Anat Rec 1999;255:212-226; Perez-Pomares et al., Dev. Biol. 2002b;247:307-326). A subset of EPDCs continue to differentiate in a variety of different cell types (including coronary endothelium, coronary smooth muscle cells (CoSMCs), interstitial fibroblasts, and atrioventricular cushion mesenchymal cells), whereas other EPDCs remain in a more or less undifferentiated state. Based on its specific characteristics, we consider the EPDC as the ultimate 'cardiac stem cell'. In this review we briefly summarize what is known about events that relate to EPDC development and differentiation while at the same time identifying some of the directions where EPDC-related research might lead us in the near future. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据