4.7 Article

Characteristics and gel properties of muscles from sardine (Sardinella gibbosa) and mackerel (Rastrelliger kanagurta) caught in Thailand

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 37, 期 10, 页码 1021-1030

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2004.06.012

关键词

myoglobin; sardine; mackerel; muscle; color; surimi; gelation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dark and ordinary muscle from sardine (Sardinella gibbosa) and mackerel (Rastrelliger kanagurta) were characterized. Lipid and myoglobin contents were higher in dark muscle than in ordinary muscle of both species, and higher contents of both constituents were found in sardine muscle than mackerel muscle. The extractable myoglobin contents in sardine dark and ordinary muscle were 14.27 and 2.18 mg/g, while mackerel dark and ordinary muscle contained 4.88 and 1.37 mg myoglobin/g sample, respectively. Alkali-soluble protein and stroma contents were greater in dark muscle than ordinary muscle. Mackerel muscle comprised a higher content of non-protein nitrogenous compounds than sardine muscle. The effect of washing conditions on the myoglobin extractability was investigated. A large amount of myoglobin was removed in the first washing cycle and only a small amount was removed in the second washing cycle. The highest removal of myoglobin from sardine (32.10-46.55%) and from mackerel muscle (103.20-313.66%) was achieved when the mince was washed with 0.2% NaCl and 0.5% NaCl, respectively. Washing media showed the marked effect on the color, expressible drip and textural properties of sardine and mackerel mince gels. The breaking force of directly heated and kamaboko gels from both sardine and mackerel mince washed with NaCl solution was higher than that of unwashed mince and water washed mince. However, no difference in deformation was observed. Washing also resulted in increased whiteness and lowered expressible moisture. In general, sardine surimi showed the superior gel-forming ability and whiteness to mackerel surimi. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据