4.6 Article

The relationship between parental nutritional status and overweight children/adolescents in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 118, 期 1, 页码 43-49

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0033-3506(03)00145-8

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. The association between overweight parents and overweight children/adolescents was investigated in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil between 1995 and 1996, controlling for the influence of socio-economic and demographic factors. Methods. Data were obtained from a two-stage, residence-based, random sample survey of children and adolescents aged 6-19 years and their parents. Body mass index (BMI) was used to classify nutritional status. Initially, a logistic regression model was built, using an indicator of parental weight (maternal BMI) as one of the independent variables and the child/adolescent's BMI as the dependent variable. Following that, the association between socio-economic and demographic variables and overweight children/adolescents was analysed in a univariate analysis. These variables were preselected for inclusion in the Logistic model, provided that their levels of statistical significance were below P = 0.25, and were added to the model individually according to the order of association strength in the univariate analysis. Finally, variables were retained in this model at a significance level of P = 0.05. Results. This study found that 20.7% of girls and 26.9% of boys were overweight, with a larger prevalence among children aged Less than 9 years. In addition to maternal BMI, the predictors of overweight children and adolescents were age, gender and the number of people in a house. Conclusions. These results demonstrate the relationship between maternal nutritional status and overweight children and adolescents, suggesting that obesity-prevention programmes should be focused on the family. (C) 2004 The Royal Institute of Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据