4.5 Article

Prospective study of job insecurity and coronary heart disease in US women

期刊

ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 24-30

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1047-2797(03)00074-7

关键词

job insecurity; coronary heart disease; prospective study; women; short term

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01-CA-87969] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-03453] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIA NIH HHS [R01-AG-12806] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P01CA087969] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [K04HL003453] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG012806] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: To examine prospectively the relationship between job insecurity and incidence of coronary heart disease (CHD) among women. METHODS: We conducted the study in 36,910 women from the Nurses' Health Study, a prospective cohort of female registered nurses residing in 11 US states. These women were 46 to 71 years old, and did not have diagnosed CHD, stroke, or cancer at baseline (1992). We collected information on job insecurity in 1992 and coronary heart disease incidence between baseline (June 1, 1992) and return of the 1996 questionnaire. RESULTS: During 4 years of follow-up, we documented 154 incident cases of CHD (113 non-fatal cases of myocardial infarction (MI) and 41 CHD deaths). After adjustment for a wide array of potential confounders, the relative risk (RR) of total CHD over 2-year follow-up was 1.35 (95% CI, 0.78-2.34) and 1.04 (95% Cl, 0.69-1.57) over 4-year follow-up. Job insecurity appeared to significantly increase the risk of non-fatal MI in the short term (2-year follow-up: RR = 1.89, 95% CI, 1.03-3.50), though not over a longer follow-up period (RR = 1.28, 95% CI, 0.82-2.00), nor fatal CHD in the short term (RR = 0.49, 95% CI, 0.22-2.08). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that job insecurity may increase the short-term risk of non-fatal MI in women. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据