4.4 Article

U-series chronology of sediments associated with Late Quaternary fluctuations, Balikun Lake, northwestern China

期刊

QUATERNARY INTERNATIONAL
卷 121, 期 -, 页码 89-98

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2004.01.025

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The U-series dating method was used to date the sediment core B(1)94 from Balikun Lake, Xinjiang, northwestern China. The samples were extracted with acids of different concentrations, and Th-230/Th-232 and U-214/Th-232 ratios of each sample were measured. Contamination with non-radiogenic Th-230 can be overcome in most instances using an isochron correction scheme for a sequential acid-leach procedure. The method can provide the most reliable dates from samples in lake of the arid-semiarid regions, where carbonate is assumed close to uranium and thorium after deposition. Where three known ages of palaeomagnetic reversals have already been obtained in the same core, the U-series ages appear to compare reasonably well with palaeomagnetic event ages. Based on the U-series chronology and stable isotope records, lake level history was reconstructed, which suggests that Balikun has been a shallow saline lake since 150 ka BP, and its level frequently changed in response to climate changes. Arid climates occurred between 129-71 ka BP and at 62-25 ka BP, corresponding to marine oxygen isotopic stages (OIS) 5 and 3, during which times Balikun Lake approached playa conditions. After 13 ka BP, the lake shrank and became a saline field and mudflat with a water table at or below the lake bed. Three major high lake stands were identified at about ca. 138-132, 69-65, and 25-18 ka BP, and the three high stand periods correspond to OIS 6, 4 and 2. Rising lake levels during the penultimate glaciation and both stades of the Last Glaciation might have resulted from the location of the lake in an and region, where the climate was controlled mainly by the westerly winds. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd and INQUA. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据