4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Characterization of an adult mock circulation for testing cardiac support devices

期刊

ASAIO JOURNAL
卷 50, 期 1, 页码 37-46

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.MAT.0000104818.70726.E6

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A need exists for a mock circulation that behaves in a physiologic manner for testing cardiac devices in normal and pathologic states. To address this need, an integrated mock cardiovascular system consisting of an atrium, ventricle, and systemic and coronary vasculature was developed specifically for testing ventricular assist devices (VADs). This test configuration enables atrial or ventricular apex inflow and aortic outflow cannulation connections. The objective of this study was to assess the ability of the mock ventricle to mimic the Frank-Starling response of normal, heart failure, and cardiac recovery conditions. The pressure-volume relationship of the mock ventricle was evaluated by varying ventricular volume over a wide range via atrial (preload) and aortic (afterload) occlusions. The input impedance of the mock vasculature was calculated using aortic pressure and flow measurements and also was used to estimate resistance, compliance, and inertial mechanical properties of the circulatory system. Results demonstrated that the mock ventricle pressure-volume loops and the end diastolic and end systolic pressure-volume relationships are representative of the Starling characteristics of the natural heart for each of the test conditions. The mock vasculature can be configured to mimic the input impedance and mechanical properties of native vasculature in the normal state. Although mock circulation testing systems cannot replace in vivo models, this configuration should be well suited for developing experimental protocols, testing device feedback control algorithms, investigating flow profiles, and training surgical staff on the operational procedures of cardiovascular devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据