4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Herceptin and gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancers that overexpress HER-2/neu

期刊

CANCER INVESTIGATION
卷 22, 期 5, 页码 706-712

出版社

MARCEL DEKKER INC
DOI: 10.1081/CNV-200032974

关键词

herceptin; HER-2/neu; pancreatic adenocarcinoma

类别

资金

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA047904] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [M01RR000056] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NCI NIH HHS [2P30 CA47904] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NCRR NIH HHS [5M01RR00056] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To determine the response rate and toxicities of Herceptin and gemcitabine for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinomas that overexpress HER-2/neu. Methods and Materials: Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer with 2+/3+ HER-2/neu expression by immunohistochemistry were eligible. Patients received gemicitabine, 1 g/m(2)/week, for 7 of 8 weeks followed by 3 of every 4 weeks, and Herceptin, 4 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 2 mg/kg/week. Results: Screening logs demonstrated the rate of HER-2/neu overexpression was 16%. Thirty-four patients were enrolled. Thirty patients (88%) had pancreatic cancers with 2+ overexpression and 4 patients (12%) had 3+ overexpression. Toxicity was similar to gemicitabine alone. Confirmed partial responses were observed in 2 of 32 patients (6%). Thirteen of 32 patients (41%) had either a partial response or a >50% reduction in CA 19-9. The median survival for all 34 patients was 7 months, and the 1-year survival was 19%. Conclusion: The response rate of Herceptin and gemcitabine is similar to gemcitabine alone. The 7-month median survival in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer Suggests there may be a modest benefit for some patients. Infrequent HER-2/neu overexpression limits the role of targeting the HER-2/neu gene and prevents definitive conclusions on the addition of Herceptin to gemcibine for patients with pancreatic cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据