4.7 Article

An electronic nose and a mass spectrometry-based electronic nose for assessing apple quality during shelf life

期刊

POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 31, 期 1, 页码 9-19

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S0925-5214(03)00129-7

关键词

apple; volatiles; gas chromatography; multivariate analysis; electronic nose; mass spectrometry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The potential of the electronic nose (E-nose) and the mass spectrometer-based E-nose (MSE-nose) to monitor changes in apple fruit volatiles during shelf life was studied. These techniques were compared with a traditional technique to measure volatiles, gas chromatography combined with mass spectrometry (GUMS). Apples were stored for 8 months at three different storage conditions and the volatile profile changes were followed subsequently over a period of 15 days. Analysis of the score plot of the principal components analysis for the E-nose measurements showed no storage history effect and only very little shelf life effect. In contrast, the MSE-nose and GUMS score plots clearly indicated the presence of both shelf life and storage history trend. Moreover, the volatile profile changes during shelf life depended on the storage history. The loading plots of the PCA of the GUMS data revealed which volatiles are important to differentiate between storage conditions and which ones are important during ripening on the shelf. Partial least square (PLS) models based on the three data sets to relate firmness and days of shelf life with the volatile production of apples were built based on the three data sets. It was found that the models based on the E-nose data had worse prediction performance than those based on the MSE-nose data. Both for firmness (0.95) and days of shelf life (0.98) a high cross-validation correlation was observed between measured and predicted values. The standard error of prediction (S.E.P.) of firmness and shelf life were 2.38 x 10(6) Hz(2) g(2/3) and 1.02 days, respectively. Models based on the GUMS data showed comparable results. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据