4.7 Article

Effects of rice-husk ash on soil consistency and compactibility

期刊

CATENA
卷 122, 期 -, 页码 54-60

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2014.05.016

关键词

Soil workability; Soil trafficability; Liquid limit; Plastic limit; Proctor compaction test

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of rice-husk ash (RHA) as a soil amendment is new and its effects on soil mechanical properties has not been well studied. This laboratory study aimed to assess the effects of rice-husk ash with different rates of 0%, 10%, 20%, and 30% (v/v) on soil consistency limits and soil compactibility parameters in soils with different textures. Rice-husk ash applications in all experimental soils significantly (p < 0.05) increased liquid limit (LL) and plastic limit (PL) values. The effectiveness of rice-husk ash on LL and PL was more pronounced in soils with low clay content. As compared with the control, the highest application dose of rice-husk ash (30%) increased LL with the rates of 29.1%, and 25.9%, in HA (Halaquept) and PL (Plagganthrept), respectively. But, the highest LL values were obtained from 20% rice-husk ash application in UD (Udifluvent). On the average, ricehusk ash application increased PL by 3.4%, 10.3%, and 14.1% with 10%, 20%, and 30% application rates, respectively, as compared to the control. Rice-husk ash application decreased maximum dry bulk density (MBD), but increased optimum water content (OWC). In all the soils studied, the lowest MBD and the highest OWC were obtained from the highest application dose of rice-husk ash. As compared with the control, the highest rice-husk ash application dose (30%) decreased the MBD with the rates of 7.2%, 8.8%, and 9.0%, in HA, PL and UD, but it increased the OWC values with the rates of 21.6%, 31.9%, and 25.5%. The findings presented in this study clearly showed that the application of rice-husk ash increases the soil resistance to mechanical forces, since an increase in OWC may imply that soil is more easily tilled in higher moisture contents without any deformation which also provides higher workable range. (c) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据