3.9 Article

Microcuff paediatric tracheal tube. A new tracheal tube with a high volume-low pressure cuff for children

期刊

ANAESTHESIST
卷 53, 期 1, 页码 73-79

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00101-003-0604-x

关键词

intubation; tracheal tube; cuff; paediatrics; high volume-low pressure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Principles and characteristics of the recently introduced Microcuff paediatric tracheal tube (Microcuff, GmbH, Weinheim, Germany) with anatomically based depth markings, cuff-free subglottic tube shaft and short high volume-low pressure cuff with ultrathin cuff membrane are presented. First available tubes (ID 4.0 mm) were evaluated regarding cuff pressures required to seal the trachea and regarding the distance from the tube tip to the carina. Methods. After obtaining approval of the local ethical committee, 20 children aged 2-4 years, receiving tracheal intubation under general anaesthesia with muscle paralysis, were included. The tubes were placed during direct laryngoscopy and glottic depth marking placed between the vocal cords. Cuff pressure to prevent audible air leakage at standardised ventilator settings (PIP 20 cmH(2)O/PEEP 5 cmH(2)O/RR20*min(-1)) was assessed by means of a cuff pressure manometer within 5 min after intubation. Subsequently, the distance from the tube tip to the tracheal carina was measured by means of fibre bronchoscopy. Data are presented as the median (range). Results. Patient age was 3.0 years (2.0-3.9 years), weight 13.5 kg (9.1-19.2 kg) and body length 95 cm (79-105 cm). The lowest cuff pressure required to seal the trachea ranged from 4-14 cmH(2)O (median 10 cmH(2)O), the distance from tube tip to tracheal carina was to 2.9 cm (2.0-4.5 cm). Conclusions. The new Microcuff paediatric tracheal tube with ultrathin high volume-low pressure cuff required tracheal sealing pressures below tracheal wall pressures usually required with uncuffed tracheal tubes for efficient sealing ventilation at 20cmH(2)O peak inspiratory pressure. The distance from the tube tip to carina was in the safe range in all patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据