4.5 Article

Experimental manipulations of tissue oxygen supply do not affect warming tolerance of European perch

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 218, 期 15, 页码 2448-2454

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.121889

关键词

Metabolism; Oxygen consumption; Aerobic scope; Hyperoxia; Anaemia; Temperature

类别

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (FORMAS)
  3. Wilhelm and Martina Lundgrens foundation
  4. Helge Axelsson Johnsson foundation
  5. Herbert and Karin Jacobsson foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A progressive inability of the cardiorespiratory system to maintain systemic oxygen supply at elevated temperatures has been suggested to reduce aerobic scope and the upper thermal limit of aquatic ectotherms. However, few studies have directly investigated the dependence of thermal limits on oxygen transport capacity. By manipulating oxygen availability (via environmental hyperoxia) and blood oxygen carrying capacity (via experimentally induced anaemia) in European perch (Perca fluviatilis Linneaus), we investigated the effects of oxygen transport capacity on aerobic scope and the critical thermal maximum (CTmax). Hyperoxia resulted in a twofold increase in aerobic scope at the control temperature of 23 degrees C, but this did not translate to an elevated CTmax in comparison with control fish (34.6 +/- 0.1 versus 34.0 +/- 0.5 degrees C, respectively). Anaemia (similar to 43% reduction in haemoglobin concentration) did not cause a reduction in aerobic scope or CTmax (33.8 +/- 0.3 degrees C) compared with control fish. Additionally, oxygen consumption rates of anaemic perch during thermal ramping increased in a similar exponential manner to that in control fish, highlighting that perch have an impressive capacity to compensate for a substantial reduction in blood oxygen carrying capacity. Taken together, these results indicate that oxygen limitation is not a universal mechanism determining the CTmax of fishes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据