4.7 Article

On the use of remote sensing techniques for monitoring spatio-temporal soil organic carbon dynamics in agricultural systems

期刊

CATENA
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 64-74

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2012.01.001

关键词

Soil erosion; Reflectance; Soil organic matter; Spectroscopy; Spatial analysis; Optical

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics affect soil quality, agricultural productivity and atmospheric CO2 concentration. Despite the need for spatial assessments of SOC content over time, reliable estimates from traditional field survey methods are limited by data availability; where measurements are often made at discrete point locations, at a coarse sample spacing or over a limited spatial extent. Remote sensing (RS) is in a strong position to provide spatially distributed, reproducible, scale-appropriate and resource-efficient measurements of SOC content and fluxes at field, landscape and regional scales. This paper provides a critical review of optical RS techniques for such applications. The first part of the paper reviews the methods, instruments and techniques used for developing predictive models for monitoring spatial SOC content. Secondly, sources of spatio-temporal SOC variations are examined, including the lateral transfer of SOC by erosion, soil structural, breakdown and land management practices, in the context of RS data and techniques. The key challenges of using RS to monitor SOC contents are discussed along with opportunities for improving SOC predictions within a spatial framework. Such opportunities include the use of ancillary data, scale-specific methods, improved development of spectral libraries and better integration of RS technologies into empirical and simulation SOC models. This paper aims to provide a transparent assessment and practical guide to RS techniques and products in order to further advance and better incorporate the use of RS methods within soil science. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据