4.7 Article

Characteristics of carbon flux in two biologically crusted soils in the Gurbantunggut Desert, Northwestern China

期刊

CATENA
卷 96, 期 -, 页码 41-48

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2012.04.003

关键词

Cyanobacterial/lichen-crusted soil; Moss-crusted soil; Precipitation; Q(10); Soil respiration; Soil surface heterogeneity

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program [2009CB825104]
  2. Chinese National Natural Scientific Foundation [41001067]
  3. West Light Foundation of The Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Different from soils in other ecosystems, soils in arid and semiarid areas are covered by biological soil crusts, which can both assimilate and release carbon via their physiological activities. Nevertheless, few studies have evaluated carbon flux in biologically crusted soils. In the current study, we investigated the daily carbon flux in moss- and cyanobacterial/lichen-crusted soils, as well as crust-removed soil (referred as bareland) in the Gurbantunggut Desert, Northwestern China from April to October 2010. We also investigated carbon flux in biologically crusted soils after 0, 2, 5, and 15 mm precipitation treatments. Carbon flux between crusted soil and bareland had no significant difference, with average values of 0.16, 0.2, and 0.12 mu mol m(-2) S-1 for moss-crusted soil, cyanobacterial/lichen crusted soil, and bareland. respectively. The corresponding (210 values for the three soils were 2.9, 3.5, and 1.9, respectively. Precipitation significantly elicited carbon flux, reaching a maximum value of 2.4 mu mol m(-2) s(-1). After precipitation, the net carbon flux in light was lower than that in dark respiration. No carbon influx was observed in light condition. The average carbon flux rate and total carbon production increased exponentially with the precipitation amount. This study indicates that biological soil crusts do not increase the respiration of soil, but increases the temperature dependence of soil carbon flux because of the higher microbial biomass than bareland. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据