4.3 Article

In vitro and in vivo investigation of a novel monoclonal antibody to plasma cells (W5 mAb)

期刊

XENOTRANSPLANTATION
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 78-90

出版社

BLACKWELL MUNKSGAARD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2004.00086.x

关键词

anti-plasma cell antibody; baboons; B cells; monoclonal antibody; plasma cells; xenotransplantation

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [P01AI045897] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [1P01 AI45897] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural antibodies (Abs), predominately anti-Galalpha1-3Gal (Gal) Abs, in non-human primates and human beings present a major hurdle to successful pig-to-primate xenotransplantation. Attempts to inhibit anti-Gal Ab production in naive baboons using non-specific immunosuppressive or B cell-specific reagents have failed. A new rat monoclonal antibody (W5 mAb) has been generated, which binds to all B cells, including memory cells, and to the majority of plasma cells, but not to T cells. It has been tested in vitro and in vivo. By immunoprecipitation, W5 mAb bound a human leukocyte antigen class II (HLA-DR) determinant. Sorting splenic or bone marrow W5+ cells resulted in a highly enriched anti-Gal Ab and total immunoglobulin (Ig)-secretory population. In vivo studies in baboons demonstrated that W5 mAb was safe but, despite the concomitant administration of an anti-CD154 mAb to inhibit sensitization, anti-rat Abs were detected within 10 days and inhibited the effect of the W5 mAb. High levels of W5 mAb were able to completely deplete B cells in the blood, but not in lymphoid tissues. Enzyme-linked spot-forming assay (ELISPOT) demonstrated that only 50 to 60% of secreting cells (SC) were depleted in the bone marrow. No reduction in the serum levels of anti-Gal Ab was observed. W5 mAb did not cause complete inhibition of anti-Gal Ab production, probably as a result of its inability to completely deplete B and plasma cells from all lymphoid compartments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据