4.7 Article

NH3-SCR over Cu/SAPO-34 - Zeolite acidity and Cu structure changes as a function of Cu loading

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 231, 期 -, 页码 64-74

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2013.11.040

关键词

Selective catalytic reduction; SAPO-34; Solid state ion exchange; In situ DRIFTs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of SAPO-34 catalysts with various Cu loadings (ranging 0.7-3.0 wt%) were prepared by the solid state ion exchange method (SSIE) and the acid properties of the catalysts were characterized by NH3TPD and in situ DRIFTS. During synthesis, more Cu migrates and exchanges at the Bronsted acid sites with increasing amounts of Cu precursor during the SSIE, resulting in a monotonic reduction in the total number of Bronsted acid sites. Interestingly, the Lewis acid sites created by Cu ions linearly increased with increasing Cu loading up to 2.0 wt% and then only slightly increased with a further increase of Cu loading up to 3.0 wt%. XRD, H2-TPR, UV-vis and DRIFTS were used to probe Cu structures. From the DRIFTS, two different perturbed T-O-T vibrations were observed for both the zeolite skeleton and NH3 adsorption spectra, indicating two different types of exchanged Cu species exist. This is also consistent with the results of NO adsorption DRIFTS spectra, in which two different Cu2+ sites were observed to adsorb NO molecules. One of the sites was considered to be the isolated Cu2+ species and the other could be another type of exchanged Cu site, possibly CuxOY, clusters (dimeric or oligomeric Cu species). The isolated Cu2+ on each sample was further identified by UV-vis and quantified by H2-TPR experiments. Based on these results, isolated Cu2+ species were found to be the active sites of NH3-SCR at low temperature. Furthermore, CuO phases were detected on the samples with high Cu loadings via XRD. The presence of CuxOy, may promote NH3 oxidation by O-2, leading to the observed decrease in standard SCR performance at high temperature. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据