4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Hydrocarbon oxidation over Fe- and Cr-containing metal-organic frameworks MIL-100 and MIL-101-a comparative study

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 238, 期 -, 页码 54-61

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2014.01.010

关键词

MIL-101; MIL-100; Heterogeneous catalysis; Alkenes; Anthracene; Selective oxidation

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [N 13-03-00413]
  2. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
  3. French Embassy in Moscow

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Catalytic properties of Fe- and Cr-based metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) MIL-100 and MIL-101 have been assessed in two liquid-phase reactions: solvent-free allylic oxidation of alkenes (cyclohexene, alpha- and beta-pinenes) with molecular oxygen and oxidation of anthracene (AN) with tert-butyl hydroperoxide(TBHP). In the oxidation of alkenes, the product selectivity strongly depends on the nature of metal (Fe or Cr) but, for the same metal, only slightly differs for the MIL-100 and MIL-101 structures. The Fe- containing MOFs afford the formation of unsaturated alcohols while Cr-based MOFs give mainly unsaturated ketones. Both Cr-MIL-100 and Cr-MIL-101 favor decomposition of cyclohexenyl hydroperoxide to produce 2-cyclohexen-1-one with 67-69% selectivity. Stability toward destruction reduced in the order Cr-MIL-101, Cr-MIL-100 > Fe-MIL-100 > Fe-MIL-101. In the oxidation of anthracene over both Cr-MOFs and Fe-MIL-101, the selectivity toward 9,10-anthraquinone (AQ) attained 100% at 92-100% AN conversion. The turnover frequency (TOF) decreased in the order Cr-MIL-101 > Fe-MIL-101 > Cr-MIL-100 > Fe-MIL-100. Cr-MIL-101 revealed superior catalytic performance in terms of AN conversion, AQ selectivity and TOF. Nearly quantitative yield of AQ was obtained after 1.5 h at 100 degrees C in chlorobenzene as solvent. No leaching of active metal occurred under optimal reaction conditions and the MOFs could be recycled several times without deterioration of the catalytic properties. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据