4.5 Article

Unsteady turbulent boundary layers in swimming rainbow trout

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 218, 期 9, 页码 1373-1385

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.108043

关键词

Particle image velocimetry; Boundary layer; Lateral line; Oncorhynchus mykiss; Skin friction; Swimming performance

类别

资金

  1. Academy of Finland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The boundary layers of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, swimming at 1.02 +/- 0.09 L s(-1) (mean +/- s.d., N=4), were measured by the particle image velocimetry (PIV) technique at a Reynolds number of 4x10(5). The boundary layer profile showed unsteadiness, oscillating above and beneath the classical logarithmic law of the wall with body motion. Across the entire surface regions that were measured, local Reynolds numbers based on momentum thickness, which is the distance that is perpendicular to the fish surface through which the boundary layer momentum flows at free-stream velocity, were greater than the critical value of 320 for the laminar-to-turbulent transition. The skin friction was dampened on the convex surface while the surface was moving towards a free-stream flow and increased on the concave surface while retreating. These observations contradict the result of a previous study using different species swimming by different methods. Boundary layer compression accompanied by an increase in local skin friction was not observed. Thus, the overall results may not support absolutely the Bone-Lighthill boundary layer thinning hypothesis that the undulatory motions of swimming fish cause a large increase in their friction drag because of the compression of the boundary layer. In some cases, marginal flow separation occurred on the convex surface in the relatively anterior surface region, but the separated flow reattached to the fish surface immediately downstream. Therefore, we believe that a severe impact due to induced drag components (i.e. pressure drag) on the swimming performance, an inevitable consequence of flow separation, was avoided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据