4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Carbon-catalyzed dye-sensitization for solar hydrogen production

期刊

CATALYSIS TODAY
卷 230, 期 -, 页码 15-19

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2013.10.020

关键词

Photochemical; Photocatalytic; Water splitting; Charge transfer; Artificial photosynthesis

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program [2012R1A2A2A01004517]
  2. Human Resource Training Project for Regional Innovation through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [2012H1B8A2026280]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012H1B8A2026280] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The catalytic effects of four different carbon materials (graphite, multi-walled carbon nanotubes, carbon fibers, and activated carbon) on dye-sensitized solar hydrogen production were investigated under a simulated solar light (AM 1.5G, 100 mW/cm(2)). Eosin-Y (EY) and triethanolamine (TEOA) were employed as a sensitizer and electron donor, respectively. All the tested carbon materials enhanced the sensitized H-2 production, while multi-walled carbon nanotubes (CNT) exhibited the highest catalytic activity with 9- and 4-fold enhanced H-2 production and photocurrent generation, respectively. This suggests that CNT is highly effective in catalyzing charge injection and thus sensitized H-2 production. With Pt loading onto the carbon materials, the H-2 production was further improved by a maximum of 10 times. With the bare carbon materials, EY underwent simultaneous spectral shifts and decreases in absorbance presumably due to stepwise de-bromination and cleavage of chromophoric groups. With CNT/Pt, however, only the former was observed despite far higher H-2 production. This indicates that the regeneration of EY is significantly enhanced with CNT/Pt. A detailed comparison of carbon materials and the sensitized mechanism was discussed. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据